Romantic Circles

Significance

Dr. Syntax was first introduced to the British public in The Schoolmaster’s Tour (1809), which appeared in Rudolph Ackermann’s Poetical Magazine, a monthly journal intended for the patrons of his “Repository of Arts” (Grego 38). In the course of this venture, Thomas Rowlandson created a caricature that was then sent to William Combe (in debtor’s prison at Kings’ Bench), who subsequently composed lines to accompany the print (Falk 156). The travels of the comical Dr. Syntax culminated in the fourth volume with his tour of the picturesque. Given the character's great success, the plates were reworked and renewed to appear in The Tour of Doctor Syntax: in Search of the Picturesque: a Poem (1812) with thirty-one illustrations. This work met with even greater approbation, and several editions were published within one season (Grego 39). Dr. Syntax’s immense popularity gave rise to a series of sequels describing other "tours" undertaken by the character, as well as a whole line of merchandise—from hats and coats to wigs (Falk 157). In this image, an illustration from his first tour in search of the picturesque, Dr. Syntax finally makes his way to London, twenty years after his last visit. He determines to discover what changes have occurred in society—in wealth, art, and taste—by going to the play at Covent Garden. Once seated in the pit, Dr. Syntax examines the architecture of the house and finds it lacking in classical columns, with “Nought but a washy wanton waste / Of gaudy tins and puny taste” (Combe 224). Attempting to find the picturesque, he finds instead that the theater is “a vast profound” in which it is “too large to hear,—to long to see” (Combe 223-24). In addition to its immensity, the theater abounds in an “unmeaning symmetry” of parts without “the striking, whole?— / A theatre should have a soul” (Combe 224). Dr. Syntax examines the theater closely for a certain kind of aesthetic, the picturesque. However, the performance of the play recontextualizes his studied gaze as an errant one: instead of attending to the actual purpose of the theater, the performed drama, Dr. Syntax ignores the actors on stage and distracts himself with tangential factors. His neighbor, the critic, voices a critique of Dr. Syntax's errant spectatorship. In response to Dr. Syntax’s musings, the critic argues that “These theatres are all a trade: / Their owners laugh at scrolls and friezes; / . . . / And you must know, it is their plan / To stick and stuff it as they can” (Combe 224). For the critic, the art and architecture of theater is a gaudy show meant to create a specific atmosphere at the least expense of money and space. For the theater owners, the “striking whole,” the guiding spirit of architecture for which Dr. Syntax searches, is not an aesthetic theory but a financial one: “’Tis a full house that pleases,” the critic says, “Your noble architect’ral graces / Would take up room, and fill up places” (Combe 224). The theater owners' prioritized, financial interest shifts the focus from the stage to the house with the implication that, rather than the drama or the architecture, it is the society filling the seats that matters. This shift is made apparent in the illustration, as most of the lines of sight are not directed at the stage but towards the boxes. Meanwhile, Dr. Syntax, though he conspicuously faces the stage, is actually gazing high up at the ceiling of the house. This absurd search for the picturesque in the inappropriate setting of the theater plays into Dr. Syntax's general habit of errant spectatorship, and so contributes to the humor of his larger quixotic quest. Rowlandson, then, offers the viewer an array of spectatorships available at the theater—and not simply the absurd, mistaken gaze of Dr. Syntax: one can, more reasonably, watch the spectacle of the drama on the stage, the spectacle of society in the boxes, or even potentially admire the theater itself for the pragmatism of its design.