1343

  • during which I was the slave of my creature

    The new terminology for Victor's relationship with the Creature, introduced four paragraphs
    earlier (III:1:9), returns with augmented stress. The underlying notion of slavery
    includes not just bondage but an absence of willed responsibility. Victor thus appears
    to be distancing himself from his recognition of the awesome obligations of a deity
    with which the second volume closed (II:9:18).

  • 1342

  • I was the slave, not the master The Creature reverts to the terms of his last confrontation of Victor Frankenstein,
    when he called Victor his slave and demanded his obedience (III:3:11 and note). The
    effect of this recantation, however, is not so much the simple reversal the diction
    connotes, as an erasure of the polarizing of his terms. Both he and Victor were slaves,
    mastered alike by their antagonism.
  • 1341

  • a sister or a brother In terms of Mary Shelley's biography, this may be a revealing, if somewhat odd, statement.
    Mary Shelley was the sole child of William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, conceived
    before they were officially married and then left motherless by Wollstonecraft's death.
    She had three step-siblings: Fanny Imlay, the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft and
    the American Gilbert Imlay, who committed suicide in 1817 while Mary was still engaged
    in the writing of Frankenstein; and Charles and Claire Clairmont, children of the
    first marriage of Godwin's second wife Mary Jane Clairmont. Because of their gender
    and nearness of age, Mary and Claire were thrown much together and experienced considerable
    sibling friction. Claire's unacknowledged pregnancy by Lord Byron was the driving
    force behind the 1816 journey to Geneva, and when her condition became known it fell
    largely to Mary to see her through the pregnancy without scandal. From this point
    on, for the next five years, Claire lived with the Shelleys both in England and Italy.
    Whatever words Victor speaks here, it is clear that Mary's closeness to her step-sister
    generally increased the suspiciousness with which she regarded Claire's motives and
    actions.
  • 1340

  • with a single man in it The villagers one and all reduce the being whom Victor has been anathematizing as
    a daemon to human proportions. In this they seem cast in the same mold as Walton's
    lieutenant who, after the initial appearance of the Creature, stolidly questions Victor
    about the "man" he has been pursuing (I:L4:11).
  • 1339

  • I shut my eyes involuntarily These two sentences encapsulate a highly complex aesthetic and moral act. It is against
    his will that Walton closes his eyes; yet with eyes closed he occupies an essentially
    different space from that in which he first viewed the Creature a second before. He
    has unwittingly placed himself in the position of the elder DeLacey, who is the only
    stranger not to have rejected the Creature at first sight (II:7:18). DeLacey's blindness
    and Walton's closed eyes remove from their judgments the beautiful as a determining
    aesthetic criterion. With its absence each is able to act on what purports to be an
    objective moral plane, or at least not to have pre-determined aesthetic categories
    prejudice their responses. Paradoxically, an act that is reflexive and therefore deterministic
    in its inception becomes the means by which unexamined, normative standards of behavior,
    which are truly deterministic in their impulse, can be transcended, allowing an exercise
    of free will. Since Walton is not actually blind, his act in its ethical import is
    unique for the novel.
  • 1338

  • a shout of tumultuous joy Although there are shrieks of fear or anger here and there across this novel's landscape,
    this is the only shout heard in Frankenstein. The intense silence of the novel, indeed,
    is a remarkable stylistic achievement. The noisy enthuasiasm of the sailors may remind
    us of Victor's recent recollection of how the Greek soldiers wept for joy upon reencountering
    the sea when they returned from Persia (III:7:17). The naturalness of the mariners'
    response stands in paradoxical contrast with Victor's sense of transcendental empowerment.
    It is little wonder that he should be awakened from his sleep by the threat simple
    humanity poses against his aims.
  • 1337

  • the shadow of a human being Although this phrase is meant to underscore the precarious state of Victor's physical
    health, it resonates within a psychological and moral construction as well, once again
    reminding us of how like the state of his Creature Victor's has become. The Creature
    functions as a shadow, not just in the modern sense of trailing Victor wherever he
    goes, but also in his incapacity ever to assume a full human dimension. Victor, in
    his isolation and his chronic sense of undiscriminating guilt, has also forsaken that
    dimension. In the late chapters of the novel Victor's physical condition is, as here,
    a measure of his psychic state.
  • 1336

  • the latter days of The text printed in 1818 has "latter days of December," which is clearly a compositor's
    error unnoticed in the Shelleys' proofreading of the text for the first edition. The
    mistake, once in print, went unnoticed in all later editions of the novel. In Mary
    Shelley's draft, however, the word is unmistakably "September." She would have had
    every reason to adhere to this timeline since, just a few weeks earlier than her fictional
    schedule, in 1814, it took the Shelley party nine days to cover the distance between
    Basel and Rotterdam (30 August-7 September) travelling exactly as do Victor Frankenstein
    and Henry Clerval and, even when adverse conditions delayed their departure from Holland,
    a three days' crossing brought them to London on 13 September (see Six Weeks' Tour
    for Switzerland and Holland).

    The attenuated journey of the 1818 text is whittled to three months in the shifting
    of the original departure date in 1831, which, as indicated earlier, may have been
    done to accommodate the timespan after Victor's return from Mont Blanc rather than
    his arrival date in England. In the next chapter, as recorded in both the 1818 and
    1831 texts, the chronology reverts to a normative calendar and Victor observes that
    he and Clerval "had arrived in England at the beginning of October" (III:2:5).

  • 1335

  • September 9th

    In 1818 the compositor, evidently reading this as one in a series of journal entries,
    surmised that it could not follow "September 12th" and added an integer to make it
    "September 19th." But, of course, what the text intends us to understand by its idiom
    is, "On September 9th the ice began to move." Since this is the date in the manuscript
    and it is restored in 1831, the text has been emended here.

  • 1334

  • September 2d A week has elapsed since Walton's last entry in the letter to his sister, a notable
    absence in a time frame that has been previously so overcharged with event. The dating
    makes comparison almost inevitable, and the reader thus becomes conscious of the curious
    fact that the entirety of Victor's narration of his life took one day less than this
    week-long lacuna in which the late-summer ice has slowly but inexorably been heaved
    by the pressures of wind and sea into threatening mountains. The natural landscape,
    as is so often the case with Mary Shelley's treatment of the sublime Arctic wilderness,
    has a corollary in the psychological development of her characters, particularly in
    the nexus of guilt and destiny driving Victor.