4166. Robert Southey to Peter Elmsley, 3 April 1824
MS: With the kind permission of the Governing Body of Westminster School. ALS; 4p.
Previously published: Nicholas Horsfall, ‘Four Unpublished Letters of Robert Southey’, Notes and Queries, 22.9 (September 1975), 402–403.
Unluckily for me there prevails an opinion that I am a person of great interest, & can assist any body in any line of life. And what is more to be regretted is, that among many troublesome interxx applications, & not a few impertinent ones, others occasionally occur which make me really wish it were in my power to befriend the applicant.
Some years ago a youth for whom I was much interested (Dusautoy was his name) was cut off by the fever at Cambridge. Both his genius & his attainments were very great, & beyond all doubt if he had lived he would have been a most distinguished person. He was one of a large family, the parents of which (the father is a half pay officer)
have endeavoured by the strictest economy to give their sons those advantages which would be well disposed upon such subjects. One of the sons
applied to me lately to get him entered as a sizer at Cambridge. I tried without success,
– there is no vacancy for two years at the College where my interes application was made,
– & the two tutors of that College who knew & esteemd his poor brother – (Blomfield
was one) – are buried in the same cloysters with him. – He is nearly 26, & of course cannot wait.
Can you procure a Bible-Clerkship
for him, – or any thing which might contribute to his support? – Devonshire is his county.
I think it is Reginald Heber who has in one of his writings vindicated the Oxford system of servitorship.
His arguments seem to me just – if the same state of feeling existed now upon that subject, as prevailed two or three centuries ago. In this respect the system at Cambridge is very much better
Can you tell me whether Francis Bugg
(of unhappy name) left his collection of Quaker books to the Library at Ch. Ch. as he said he intended to do? – My designs upon George Fox
have, as you may suppose, excited a stir throughout all Quakerdom.
You should have given a portrait of South with your edition of his Sermons.
To withhold it, looks as if Oxford were ashamed of his ugly physiognomy, which he was not himself, for he prefixed it to each of the six volumes published in his life time.
There is a poem to his memory by Sam. Wesley, who praises him as having been
Against the best of temper, strongly good. (12)
Milman I think could not have read his sermons when he wrote that paper in the last Quarterly.
The name of South does not appear there, & there are some remarks of S. upon the different styles of preaching in his days to which he would certainly xxxx have referred if he had seen them.
Yrs very truly
R Southey.
Have you seen Landor’s book?
– There were many passages in it, which if they had not been cut out, would have insured him the stiletto, or the sand-bag – if that pleasant mode of murder is still in use with the Italians