4192. Robert Southey to Neville White, 27 May 1824
MS: MS untraced; text is taken from John Wood Warter (ed.), Selections from the Letters of Robert Southey, 4 vols (London, 1856)
Previously published: John Wood Warter (ed.), Selections from the Letters of Robert Southey, 4 vols (London, 1856), III, pp. 425–427.
I had heard from Edith of my little godson’s perilous state,
and did not like to write to you under the uncertainty concerning him. Precarious as human life always is, it is peculiarly so in infancy; but, on the other hand, recovery from the very brink of the grave is much more frequent than it is in any other stage of existence. To hope the best, and to be ready for the worst, is our duty in this, as, indeed, in all other cases; and it is a duty which you, I am sure, practise as well as preach. I will hope for good tidings, and shall be anxious to receive them.
Now to the business part of your letter. But first, let me thank you for your good–will and exertions in my brother’s behalf, and say that any names which you may procure may be sent to me.
I should very well like to edit Sir T. Browne’s works, write a biographical introduction, and add such Omniana notes as my stores may enable me to furnish.
That the speculation will answer to the publishers I am not so sure as Hudson Gurney
seems to be; and this you should say to Mr. Wilkin. But the London booksellers must be the best judges upon a question of republication. I should be very far from allowing this concerning a new work. As to terms, I had two hundred guineas for editing the “Morte Arthur,”
which was what Longman offered, being the sum they were to have given a certain person who was originally announced as editor, but left the book and the booksellers in the lurch, for the sake of decamping with another man’s wife.
So it is plain that in that sum nothing was allowed for a good name, if mine was not estimated at a better price than his. With that sum, however, I should be content, because I do not think the speculation could afford more; though, if the risk rested with London publishers, I would take all I could get, being richly entitled so to do from them. When I add, that I possess the folio edition of 1686 of Sir T.’s works,
and no other, and nothing else of his writings, I shall have said all which, in this step of the business, it can be necessary to say.
There is reasonable ground for hoping that a good deal may be recovered. Tenison speaks of other brief discourses, and of memorials which had been collected for writing his life.
One thing, however, must be taken into account in the terms. I had nothing to do with correcting the proofs of the “Morte Arthur;” and this is a matter of more importance with Sir Thomas Browne, owing to the peculiarity of his language, than with any other prose writer. Supposing that Wilkin means to print the work himself, he must get some person who is a scholar (and an ordinary one will not do) to revise the sheets. The time which that task would require I cannot afford. Should this lead to any transmission of materials, the Quaker volume
may come and be returned with them; otherwise it may wait till I see Norwich once more. Express, I pray you, my thanks to its owner for this civility.
It was a great disappointment to us not to see you. I had fully expected you, and wish very, very much you could still come, persuaded as I am that it would be greatly to your good.
My paper in the last “Q.R.” was upon Dr. Dwight’s “Travels.”
There was nothing of mine in the preceding number. I am now reviewing “Hayley’s Memoirs:”
a poor, insipid book; but it has made me like the man, and he deserves to be treated with respect and kindness.
God bless you, my dear Neville,
Yours affectionately,
ROBERT SOUTHEY.