4204. Robert Southey to Neville White, 24 June 1824
MS: Cambridge University Library, Add 8462. TR; 2p.
Previously published: John Wood Warter (ed.), Selections from the Letters of Robert Southey, 4 vols (London, 1856), III, pp. 427–428.
Note on MS: This letter survives in manuscript as a partial, undated transcript in an unknown hand. Our text is therefore taken from the slightly fuller version found in Warter, Selections from the Letters of Robert Southey, 4 vols (London, 1856).
You see I judged rightly concerning the encouragement which Mr. Wilkin, was likely to find from the London booksellers.
This is a subject on which they are necessarily the best judges. A second edition is not to be hoped for in a case like this, nor do I think there is any reasonable expectation that so large an edition as 1000 will sell. I advise him not to print more than 750, and tell him, further, that highly desirable as such a collection is of this authors works, it would be prudent not to venture more than 500.
The best service I can render him will be to review the book, which of course is incompatible with editing it. Edit it I ought not to do, unless I could allow to the time and care necessary for doing it in a manner creditable to myself. This I cannot give, and the speculation cannot afford to purchase. Mr. Wilkins had better take ‘Johnsons Life,’ to which Kippis’s account (if it contains much additional information) may be annexed.
Let him then arrange the works chronologically, with brief notes affixed to each, when it was first published, through how many editions it has passed, and what edition has been followed in the reprint. And if he is desirous of reducing the bulk of the work, throw away all the annotations of other writers, except Sir Kenelm Digby's
remarks. All that remains will be to take especial care that it be correctly printed, and state, in a brief and modest preface, the motive for forming the collection, the pains which have been taken in obtaining unpublished papers, and the success with which that search has been attended. The correspondence should follow the life, if it be at all of a domestic and familiar character; but if it relates wholly (as is most likely) to discursive subjects, such as were the object of his studies, it had better then be placed at the end of the collection.
A review in the ‘Quarterly’ will be of much greater advantage to Mr. Wilkin than my name as editor could be. What I should have written as a life, preface, or introduction, may just as well be cast into that form. I lose no time in replying to your letter, that he may lose none in making his arrangements and beginning the print.
God bless you my dear friend,
Yours affectionately,
R.S.